Quantcast
Channel: UsingEnglish.com ESL Forum - Ask a Teacher
Viewing all 44737 articles
Browse latest View live

[Grammar] like most - like less

$
0
0
Suppose we are talking about food served at a party. You ask me what servings I liked most and I answer: The one I liked most was XX and the one I liked less was XX.
Are these expressions correct?
Thank you.

You're not far off retirement.

$
0
0
Hello once again.

Does "You're not far off retirement" mean "You are going to retire soon"?

Thank you.

past three a.m.

$
0
0
Hello,

https://www.ego4u.com/en/cram-up/vocabulary/time

It is not usual to use a.m. and p.m. with past/to.

Example: 3:15 - fifteen minutes past three OR a quarter past three.

Do natives agree with that? Can we not say, 'It is fifteen minutes past three a.m.' or 'It's ten (minutes) to ten p.m.'?

Thanks.

[General] Living the life

$
0
0
What does mean sentence below? Thank in advance.

LIVING THE LIFE I ALWAYS DREAMT OF LIVING

A Word ???

$
0
0
Many women find it hard to juggle motherhood with their professional obligations and this has led people to talk about the need for a greater work/life ........

Could you please help me ?

Is this grammatically correct: How important is a government to its country? It's t

$
0
0
Is this grammatically correct:

How important is a government to its country? It's the foundation of the country's society thus making it a critical component to the country's civilization.

[General] to be full of concern over/about/for

$
0
0
Which one of the sentences below is correct?

1. She is full of concern for the welfare of her children.
2. She is full of concern over the welfare of her children.
3. She is full of concern about the welfare of her children.

he was almost going to crash

$
0
0
Hi,

*self-made*

- Last day we got on the bus to go to the cinema. The driver were such a careless man; he was almost going to crash the bus.
- Last day we got on the bus to go to the cinema. The driver were such a careless man; he would almost crash the bus.

I cannot figure out what is the difference in meaning between 'would' and 'was going to' in the above sentence. :oops:

I need help for a question from a RC

$
0
0
Hi, I have a problem with the following question from the below reading, from "The Official Guide for GMAT Review 2015". I will appreciate if you help me. Thank you so much.

Reading:
Manufacturers have to do more than build large manufacturing plants to realize economies of scale. It is true that as the capacity of a manufacturing operation rises, costs per unit of output fall as plant size approaches “minimum efficient scale,” where the cost per unit of output reaches a minimum, determined roughly by the state of existing technology and size of the potential market. However, minimum efficient scale cannot be fully realized unless a steady “throughput” (the flow of materials through a plant) is attained. The throughput needed to maintain the optimal scale of production requires careful coordination not only of the flow of goods through the production process, but also of the flow of input from suppliers and the flow of output to wholesalers and final consumers. If throughput falls below a critical point, unit costs rise sharply and profits disappear. A manufacturer’s fixed costs and “sunk costs” (original capital investment in the physical plant) do not decrease when production declines due to inadequate supplies of raw materials, problems on the factory floor, or inefficient sales networks. Consequently, potential economies of scale are based on the physical and engineering characteristics of the production facilities—that is, on tangible capital—but realized economies of scale are operational and organizational, and depend on knowledge, skills, experience, and teamwork—that is, on organized human capabilities, or intangible capital.


The importance of investing in intangible capital becomes obvious when one looks at what happens in new capital-intensive manufacturing industries. Such industries are quickly dominated, not by the first firms to acquire technologically sophisticated plants of theoretically optimal size, but rather by the first to exploit the full potential of such plants. Once some firms achieve this, a market becomes extremely hard to enter. Challengers must construct comparable plants and do so after the first movers have already worked out problems with suppliers or with new production processes. Challengers must create distribution networks and marketing systems in markets where first movers have all the contacts and know-how. And challengers must recruit management teams to compete with those that have already mastered these functional and strategic activities.

Question:
38. The passage suggests that which of the following is true of a manufacturer’s fixed and sunk costs?
(A) The extent to which they are determined by market conditions for the goods being manufactured is frequently underestimated.
(B) If they are kept as low as possible, the manufacturer is very likely to realize significant profits.
(C) They are the primary factor that determines whether a manufacturer will realize economies of scale.
(D) They should be on a par with the fixed and sunk costs of the manufacturer’s competitors.
(E) They are not affected by fluctuations in a manufacturing plant’s throughput.

Answer:
I checked B and the writer of the book says that E is correct. He say about these two options:
B) The passage emphasizes that failing to keep throughput at an efficiently high level reduces profitability because that failure results in increased cost per unit (to which, of course, the plant’s fixed and sunk costs contribute). But the passage does not claim that keeping aggregate fixed and sunk costs very low is necessary in order to have the

most competitive production operation.
E) Correct. According to the passage, “throughput” refers to the flow of materials through a plant. This flow can vary as a result of various factors, but fixed and sunk costs—financial resources already committed—remain the same regardless of such variation.

But these explanations are not convincing for me and I am urging that B is correct, because the red part of the reading discuss the correctness of B. Am I wrong?

[Grammar] Using or omitting 'it'

$
0
0
Hello,

I wanted to ask about the usage of 'it' in a very particular sentence structure. I am not exactly sure which one of the following is correct. The sentences are:

"I assumed that by 'rent' was meant that..."

or

"I assumed that by 'rent' it was meant that..."

Thank you for reading my message.

The clerk said to me that he will see if he can help me with the price of the service

$
0
0
The clerk said to me that he will see if he can help me with the price of the services he provides.

I say:

Really? Could/would you do that for me. Thanks!

Are both okay?

[Grammar] would be + -ing form

$
0
0
Hello,

I wanted to ask if the structure 'would be' + -ing form of a verb is acceptable when talking about the future. For example:

"You would pay $200 each month"

or

"You would be paying $200 each month".

Are both forms acceptable or not? How do they differ in meaning?

Thanks for reading my message.

"hit"?

$
0
0
Quote:

The photograph of Daniel was originally posted online by medical student Joyce Gilos Torrefranca. She posted two grainy photos to her Facebook page, saying: "I got inspired by a kid."

Ms Torrefranca said she was taken aback by Daniel's diligent dedication to his homework.
"I'm fortunate my parents were able to send me to school," she said. "I seldom go to coffee shops to study, but this kid just hit me. You really don't need much, you just have to be determined and focused on the things that you want to achieve."

Homeless Filipino boy overwhelmed by support after being photographed doing homework

http://www.smh.com.au/world/homeless...#ixzz3fd0wZTcd


Is the word "hit" used in the sense of "inspired" in the given context?

[Grammar] Noun phase?

$
0
0
" the chaos is evidence that leaving the euro would be disastrous for Greece, not least because modest gains from the default and devaluation would be overwhelmed by political and economic instability" (sentence quoted from "The Economist")

in this sentence, after the "because", there are two parts, one is noun phase and another one is just SVO structure. i just wonder if the first part is incorrect or i should use different angle to view this sentence. Thanks a lot

please help me with these sentences the differences

$
0
0
i want to know difference between these two sentences

i have gone to America
i have gone in America


or

i have been in America
i have been to America

or
i have gone to America
i have gone to in America

George Farquhar The Beaux Stratagem

$
0
0
Hi;

Again, I'm translating The Beaux Stratagem from Farquhar. It's written in an old English. Sometimes I have difficulty about translating this play. So, I want to ask you, what is "my valour is downright Swiss."

This is the some part of th conversation has it:

"And if you go to that, how can you, after what is passed, have the confidence to deny me? Was not this blood shed in your defence, and my life exposed for your protection? Look 'ee, madam, I 'm none of your romantic fools, that fight giants and monsters for nothing; my valour is downright Swiss; I'm a soldier of fortune, and must be paid."

[Grammar] threw away, throwing away, had thrown away

$
0
0
I wrote two possible answers to the following synthesis question. I prefer the first but I'm unsure. The second seems weird. Kindly help me to understand which is correct and why.

Question: Father threw away his old pair of shoes. Then he bought a new pair.

- Answer 1: After throwing away his old pair of shoes, Father bought a new pair.
- Answer 2: After Father had thrown away his old pair of shoes, he bought a new pair.

Thank you! :-D

[Grammar] how to improve grammar ?

is Steiner not complicit with this state of affairs?

$
0
0
What does "is Steiner not complicit with this state of affairs?" mean here?



I think it means "dose not Steiner have any role in the conflicts between the feminists and the Marxists? yes, she has, and worse that...."



"Steiner may be recognising a hitherto suppressed feminine aesthetic but even to dare to speak of beauty seriously is to lay herself open to accusations of naivety, self-deception and a lack of humour. And, also, of course, of gross political incorrectness. For was not the experience of Beauty largely reconstructed in the eighteenth century as an affirmation of bourgeois capitalist identity, as the Marxist critic Herbert Marcuse has proposed? Rich and powerful men desire to possess it as a sign of their wealth and power – their lovely architectures and landscaped vistas, their art and clothes, their beautiful women and children, indicative of their superior position, health and happiness. In the grumbling skirmishes between the feminists and the Marxists, is Steiner not complicit with this state of affairs? Worse, the evolutionary psychologists have reconstructed much the same thing and, as we shall see in Chapter 4, some theorists and social scientists believe they may even have a political agenda."

[General] attempts to survive in the face of the shortcomings of welfare system leaves

$
0
0
I've recently read in a magazine for learners of English text like that:

"It has never been easy being a single parent. Today's pace of life, and attempts to survive in the face of the shortcomings of the welfare system leaves little room for extra duties."


The article wasn't written by a native speaker that's why I'm in doubt if the text is correct and natural?
Viewing all 44737 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images